Monday, June 17, 2019

Four HR Questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Four HR Questions - Essay ExampleHowever, it is vital to note that the closings interpreted under particular situation may not hold good for all situations, in fact they may give negative results under variant circumstances. This implies that effective attractorship calls for consistently making situation based decisions. From literature, situational leadership advocates for great participation of employee in decision making on the premise that the much employees participate in decision making the more they will accept the decisions taken. It with this line of thought that Vroom and Yetton (1973) proposed a Situational leadership model called the normative decision model. The normative model identifies five different decision procedures that range on the situation and level of involvement from autocratic to consultative to group-based decisions. Even though, situational leadership advocates for greater employee participation, Vroom and Yetton (1973) identified that not all decis ion making situations need to go through the process of consultation. To enable leaders isolate the instances where decision making would require consultation from those where consultations would add little value, Vroom and Yetton (1973) formulated seven questions which leaders can use to determine the level of subordinate involvement in decision making. The seven questions touch on problem information, commitment, and decision graphic symbol and acceptance. Putting Vroom and Yetton (1973) normative model to use it can be sight that consultation would be a waste of time in the following circumstances (1) where the leader has sufficient information to make a high quality decision and acceptance of the decision by subordinates is not overcritical for its slaying (2) where neither the nature of the solution nor the acceptance of the decision by subordinates is critical to the implementation of the decision (3) where the nature of the solution is not critical and whatever the leader decides it is reasonably certain that his / her subordinates would accept (4) where the nature of the solution is critical but the leader has sufficient information to make a high quality decision. In this instance even though the acceptance of the decision by subordinates would be critical to its implementation, if the leader is reasonable certain that he / she has sufficient influence over his / her subordinates to the extent that they would most certainly accept his / her decision then consultations would be a waste of time. In conclusion, to enable effective decision making a leader would find using Vroom and Yetton (1973) seven questions and normative model a critical tool that will save him / her time, effort and likelihood of success for the decisions that he / she takes. Identify the potential difference in human resource focus (HRM) policies between two organizations where one follows a low-cost strategy and the other follows a differentiated, quality enhancement

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.